So they gimped their computers based on "someone might make some more efficient parts someday hopefully"?Īpple has access to component makers' roadmap presentations. Tl dr: Apple built this new MacBook Pro case for more efficient components than are available today. Yeah, disappointed buyers can return the new MacBook Pro and wait another year or two for battery performance to improve as less power hungry components are put in the MBP in the coming years. Thin is great for many things, but thinness at the expensive of functionality is just stupid.Īpple decided that the early adopters can suck a product with lacklustre battery this year in exchange for the next 4 years of adequate battery life and the thinness they want. You have a MacBook with a shit keyboard and one port, a Pro with crap battery life and phone with an unsightly camera bump plus the added kicker of broken compatibility with 99.9% of the worlds headphones (with their wireless replacement delayed to boot). The obsession with thinness is fast approaching a frivolous pursuit. They picked the second choice for better or for worse.ģ) gain a mm or two by putting in a sufficiently sized battery? Put out a shiny new MacBook Pro that is not optimized for available components. Put up with the yawns and "Apple doesn't care about Mac!" accusations.Ģ. Put out another same-old-same-old designed MacBook Pro this year. There's some serious mental gymnastics there. Wait, so this isn't Apples fault due to their questionable design decisions at all, someone else is to blame? Tl dr: Apple built this case for more efficient components than are available today. I can see how their hand was forced into doing the latter too because the previous design was being regarded (justifiably or not) as "stale" and "boring".Īpple sticks to MacBook case designs for a long time, so they wouldn't put out a slightly larger version to accommodate the "correct" amount of battery this time. The main power-consuming components haven't advanced as far as Apple hoped in time for the MacBook Pro redesign, or they are knowingly putting out a less-than-exemplary product today in anticipation of the more efficient stuff coming. Seeing as Apple uses case designs for YEARS, my suspicion is that Apple designed the new MacBook Pro case optimized around future components (that don't yet exist) instead of around what's available now. So you're kind of saying that Apple should cede the "light and powerful" market. The 12" MacBook and the Airs are perfectly usable, but pretty gimped CPU wise compared to the XPS line and these. For slimmer and lighter designs they already offer the other MacBooks. I would be willing to trade 3mm and more weight for more performance. I guess either way, the 'net has to complain. In practice I think it would be bad for Apple, people would be laughing at how tubby and outdated they were compared to the competition, even more so for phones. On a practical level I agree that I'd be willing to trade another 3mm or so and a half a pound for a slightly bigger battery. ![]() Now everyone has caught up with good life and solid laptop designs and it's bad if you only get 8 hours. I was never a mac fan but I had to give it to them for the radical change. You'd be lucky to get more than 2-3 hours from any non-mac laptop in 2010. ![]() It's actually kind of funny, because I can remember when the unibody MacBooks changed the game with their battery life and solid construction. This is one of the biggest capitals that Apple has Of course this doesn't apply if you are satisfied with the battery life you're getting.Īpple pride is too strong for many people to even admit that they are dissatisfied. I've been saying, anyone dissatisfied with the battery life of their new MacBook Pro should return it for a refund.Įnduring a design decision that you disagree with is never going to change things, and Apple will not change their thinness/battery calculus unless they get tens of thousands of returns.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |